Maturing Communities of Practice: Tuning the Soundboard of Collective Learning
Introduction: What Are Communities of Practice (CoPs)?
A Community of Practice (CoP) is more than a working group or interest circle. It is a dynamic, evolving group of people who share a concern, a set of problems, or a passion about a topic and deepen their knowledge and expertise by interacting on an ongoing basis. CoPs are built on mutual engagement, a shared domain of interest, and a repertoire of practices.
They form organically or can be intentionally cultivated. In either case, CoPs enable social learning, support knowledge sharing, and create space for collaborative problem-solving. CoPs have been adopted across sectors — from education and healthcare to NGOs, corporate environments, and public administration — as effective vehicles for capability development and innovation.
To explore more about the foundational ideas and practices, see the Wenger-Trayners’ CoP Guidebook and related reflections on Building and Growing Communities of Practice.
Context: Why Focus on the Maturity of a CoP?
While CoPs often emerge naturally, their long-term impact depends on intentional development. Many communities plateau or lose momentum without structured reflection. The maturity of a CoP is not about hierarchy or time — but about the depth of relationships, clarity of purpose, and effectiveness in generating value for members and the wider context.
Understanding CoP maturity allows community leaders, facilitators, and supporters to:
- Assess where the community currently stands
- Identify strengths and areas for development
- Design appropriate interventions
- Navigate tensions and trade-offs between stability and transformation
Guiding question: Is your community growing by design or drifting by default?
The Maturity Framework: Tuning the Dimensions Like a Soundboard
The maturity model introduced by Beverly and Etienne Wenger-Trayner is grounded in real-world community development and includes seven interrelated dimensions. These offer a rich structure for strategic reflection and planning:
Beverly Wenger-Trayner encourages us to imagine the model like a soundboard in a music studio: each dimension is a slider. There is no “correct” setting — and no fixed position. Communities have their own unique “sound,” which they are constantly tuning depending on context, purpose, and evolving needs.
This metaphor reminds us: maturity is not a formula — it is a living, adaptive design.
“There are no right or wrong responses — each community will sound different. And it should.” – Beverly Wenger-Trayner
1. Practice
The community’s ability to support members in their day-to-day work through learning, tools, methods, and feedback loops.
- Are we helping each other with real challenges from practice?
- Do we document and reflect on what we learn together?
2. Domain
The clarity, legitimacy, and development of the shared domain of interest.
- Have we defined our domain in a way that others can understand and connect to?
- Are we shaping and contributing to this domain in the wider world?
3. Context
The CoP’s relationship to its organizational or societal environment.
- How do we fit within our broader landscape?
- Are we building partnerships and responding to trends?
4. Community
The sense of belonging, shared norms, and pathways to deeper participation.
- Who belongs to our community, and why?
- How do newcomers integrate and grow within the group?
5. Identification
The emotional and personal connection members have with the community and its purpose.
- Do we foster strong, trusting relationships?
- Is there a shared identity and culture that supports agency?
6. Leadership
How leadership is distributed and enacted within the community.
- Who takes initiative and leads — and how is that supported?
- Do we intentionally develop new leadership capacities?
7. Self-Awareness
The community’s ability to reflect on its own learning processes and strategic direction.
- Are we aware of the value we create?
- Do we revisit and reimagine our collective goals?
Guiding question: Which dimensions are we strong in — and where do we need to grow?
Reflections from Practice: A Workshop Experience
In October 2025, members of the Ukrainian CoP Guidebook Translation Team participated in the first full-depth “Maturing CoP” workshop, hosted by the Wenger-Trayners in Portugal. The workshop offered a unique opportunity to experience the model in action — using real community cases, engaging in peer clinics, and mapping the seven dimensions with clarity and care.
Participants appreciated how the model supports both emerging and established CoPs. It provides a common language that bridges practice and strategy. As one participant noted: “It helps us see the community not as a product — but as a living process.”
Guiding question: What would change if we viewed community growth as a strategic design challenge?
Application: How Can the Maturity Model Be Used?
The CoP maturity model is a flexible tool, adaptable to different contexts. It can be applied in:
- Industry: To strengthen internal knowledge-sharing communities, innovation hubs, or cross-functional teams.
- NGOs and civil society: To support networked learning, build leadership pipelines, and scale good practices.
- Public sector: For building communities around policy domains, reform initiatives, or shared missions.
- Education and academia: To enhance peer-to-peer learning, connect researchers, or build interdisciplinary collaboration.
Use cases include:
Community self-assessment and strategy development
Leadership development and succession planning
Funding and sponsorship alignment
Evaluation of community impact
Guiding question: Where could this framework add clarity or spark growth in your context?
Summary: From CoP to Mature Learning Ecosystem
A mature Community of Practice is not simply older or bigger. It is one that has evolved in alignment with its purpose, people, and context — supported by reflection and intentional action.
The seven dimensions of maturity offer a powerful mirror and roadmap. Whether you are cultivating a grassroots learning circle or stewarding a transnational network, this framework can help you:
- Deepen collective learning
- Support leadership and identity
- Enhance strategic relevance
Final question: What is your community ready to mature into?
This article was inspired by the Community Maturity Workshop (October 2025) with Beverly and Etienne Wenger-Trayner, and supported by the Ukrainian CoP Guidebook Translation Project.






¿𝗤𝘂𝗲́ 𝗲𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗼? ¿𝗬 𝗰𝗼́𝗺𝗼 𝗹𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗿í𝗮 𝗱𝗲 𝗹𝗮 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮 𝗺𝗮́𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲? Aquí, utilizando el ejemplo de un cocinero y sus actividades en la cocina, se presenta el concepto de la escala de conocimiento según Klaus North
¿𝗤𝘂𝗲́ 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗲 𝗲𝗹 𝘁𝗲́𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝘆 𝗱𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲́ 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗻𝗲?𝗦𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝗻 𝘂𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗿 𝗲𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹í𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗼 𝘆 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹í𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗼, 𝗹𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗮, 𝗹𝗮 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗱, 𝗹𝗮 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗼́𝗻 𝘆, 𝗽𝗼𝗿 𝘂́𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗼, 𝗲𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗲 𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼́𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝘆 𝘀𝘂 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗼́𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗮́𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮.
🔦 Imaginemos que un chef trabaja en un restaurante que quiere ofrecer una nueva sección de platos vegetarianos en el menú.
El chef sabe cómo cocinar verduras, pero no tiene mucho conocimiento sobre cómo crear platos vegetarianos sabrosos y bien equilibrados que atraigan a los comensales.
Para abordar esta situación, el chef puede aplicar la gestión del conocimiento para obtener el conocimiento necesario para crear estos platos.
Primero, el chef puede comenzar por recopilar información sobre los ingredientes vegetales disponibles y sus propiedades nutricionales.
Luego, puede buscar datos sobre las preferencias de los comensales en relación con los platos vegetarianos y la demanda del mercado en general.
A través de esta recopilación de información y datos, el chef puede adquirir conocimientos explícitos y comprender mejor el contexto en el que se encuentra trabajando.
Después de adquirir este conocimiento, el chef puede aplicar su capacidad culinaria y comenzar a experimentar con diferentes ingredientes y técnicas para crear platos vegetarianos sabrosos y bien equilibrados.
Con el tiempo, puede compartir su conocimiento con otros chefs y miembros del personal en el restaurante, lo que fomenta la gestión del conocimiento colectivo en la organización.
Finalmente, al utilizar activa, consciente y sistemáticamente el conocimiento adquirido, el chef puede crear platos vegetarianos exitosos y así desarrollar la competencia sobre la cocina vegetariana, destacar con sus platos del resto de los restaurantes al rededor y ganar con el tiempo una ventaja competitiva para el restaurante.
A través de la gestión del conocimiento operativo y estratégico, el chef ha adquirido el conocimiento necesario para crear nuevos platos y mejorar la calidad del menú en general, lo que ha llevado al éxito del negocio.
👉 Aquí puedes leer las definiciones en nuestro glosario: https://lnkd.in/duEMu-Jt
https://lnkd.in/enWiXVj3
¿𝗧𝗲 𝗵𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗮𝗱𝗼 𝘂́𝘁𝗶𝗹 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲 𝗲𝗷𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗼? 𝗘𝘀𝗰𝗿í𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗼 𝗲𝗻 𝗹𝗼𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗼𝘀!